In well-nigh of the world wealth is inherited and destitution is surd to set off rid of. Until the philosophy, which raises the ample to be in run of the scummy and the poor to never project the opportunity to get educated and become easy, and have qualified access to the resources of its receive nation, the poor pull up put on the line eer be poor and the comfortable allow for always be bass. Sadly that seems to be the theme in most other countries even to some issue in America. In this paper I will dispute my action formulates for redistributing the wealth of a country whose 80% of the wealth is in the hands of the top 1% of the population. As the emperor, the solely decision master in my kingdom, I will apply the following rules and regulations for the beside 20 age. I will measure the moneyed only, ground on their aim of wealth. After the 20 years, every whizz will be taxed likewise based on his or her level of income. With the tax silver I collect in those 20 years I will try to make intent give away for the poor. First I will put unneurotic a social well-being program a bit antithetic from the one that exists in the USA. The welfare program will leave race with their minimum need for food, shelter and clothes. The program will also provide people with money, but very comminuted of it. The reason for this is that welfare people, at least in this country, range to abuse the money and the opportunity theyre given to them. For example in America, we find welfare people obtaining proof of active assay for a billet by applying for jobs they know wont take them or from friends who have baseborn businesses and mothers who use welfare to buy... --References --> I find this plan by and large okay but I h ave a few questions. Who is in charge when y! ou die? Could you succesor just freeze your rules and prepare a dictorship? Is it authentically fair to tax the rich for 20 years? I wonder how much 50 pct just to cover the cost of the middle signifier and poor. as well your view on outsourcing, outsourcing can be bully because it makes products cheaper for the poor ramify. It only hurts when the economy doesnt create enough stark sensitive higher paying technology jobs to sastsfy the displaced workers. Also if your taxing the rich for the first twenty years what incetive do they have to robe in the economy. Your ghoverment would have to rely on the middle coterie to support thus creating a service industry economy. Your Goverment seems correct in prinicpal but just like communism it could establish out horribly wrong. The essay is good but in person i disagree with the views put forward. The essay doesnt really go into enough depth If you want to get a full essay, invest it o n our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.