Attribution Theory Essay

No creature in this planet give the bounce exercise the faculty of drive as often as we gentleman persons do. As rational beings, we normally engage in an array of activities which require critical opinion or thoughtful consideration. At to the lowest degree for those who be fortunate to be sharp with normal bodily functions, it is axiomatic to calculate that we military mane persons are expected to institutionalise reason to everything that we do.For instance, we do not kindle up at two in the morning and prepare to go to tutor simply for no reason whatsoever. In a manner of speaking, the faculty of human reason allows us to do things on account of some reason fitted purposes. The port we appoint sense or cast reason to almost everything that surrounds us makes us, more(prenominal) than anything else, human persons by right of system of logical system and supposition. Reading through and through the article The ascription Theory, I am subject to as yet more affi rm the primeval tendency of human reason to sample for explanation of things. Therein I was able to learn that the system of attribution draws from the introductory supposition that human reason so naturally tends to seek for explanation to things. This, in many ways, is intricately knitted to the logic underneath the principle of causality, which basically assumes that our minds puree hard to grapple for sufficient explanations to sustain us make sense of everything that happens. The theory of ascription is no less incompatible in that, like the principle of causality, it alike tries to seek for an adequate explanation of things. exclusively things considered, it send packing enable us to look into the seemingly insatiable desire of human persons to seek explanation for things. Secondly, the article as well as made me realize how potent, nay, powerful human reason deal bugger off. In the article, it cites a number of studies that were done so as demonstrate the effi cacy of the theory. The mainline thesis is to show that the theory of Attribution, especially when it is internally reinforced, can produce behavioral changes to a person or groups of persons. The article even notes that when race tend to attribute authoritative events as directly stemming from their personal involvement, it produces operative behavioral changes.When for instance, a person is repeatedly introduced to the idea, say, that his or her high grades are imputable to the painstaking but admirable attempt he pours into his studies, it constrains a personal legal opinion system that appear to cater to much(prenominal) reinforcements. This means that a person who is able to embrace a belief that his or her efforts serve him or her well in the process will normally become motivated to study on his or her own. This displays, more than anything else, the power of human reason to translate personal belief systems into tactual behavioral patterns. But reading through the a rticle also made me opinion a bit cautious as well. If through the theory of Attribution we can make people create refreshful attitudes or beliefs or behaviors depending upon the explanation they make, therefore it behooves us to proceed with much care in reinforcing beliefs on them (The Attribution Theory). Surely, we cannot allow people to think negatively ab come to the fore themselves, especially on issues which may involve anger, grief, guilt, among others.As indeed, we cannot let people believe that some tragic moments in life, which can happen beyond our control, are internally attributable to their doings nevertheless the very(prenominal). If we truly want to create an appoint individual by applying the theory of Attribution, then it is only justified that we ought to inculcate electropositive reinforcements on to everyone so as to create positive avenues for behavioral changes. Along the same vein, we must always help cheer people from creating a monster out of int ernal belief-systems, which, on the final analysis, can eventually, nay only translate to surly and unfortunate behaviors.Work CitedThe Theory of Attribution, SBB 1996. Retrieved 10 September 2008,